<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Broadband Bullsheet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadbandbullsheet.com</link>
	<description>The bull stops here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 06:02:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T: Our Broadband Is Fast Enough</title>
		<link>http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?p=9</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?p=9#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alexander graham bull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Are you owed $3000.00?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


What they say
 What  it means


&#8220;We feel comfortable&#8230;based on how we deploy, that we can match the  needs of the customer,&#8221;
It&#8217; boggles the mind. In  most AT&#38;T states customers paid for fiber optic services &#8212; But the new AT&#38;T has been able to pull a bait and switch relying on old, copper wiring]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="5" cellpadding="10" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="40%">What they say</th>
<th> What  it means</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span style="text-decoration: underline;">&#8220;We feel comfortable&#8230;based on how we deploy, that we can match the  needs of the customer</span>,&#8221;</td>
<td>It&#8217; boggles the mind. In  most AT&amp;T states customers paid for fiber optic services &#8212; But the new AT&amp;T has been able to pull a bait and switch relying on old, copper wiring that can&#8217;t handle speeds that were promised in 1992</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" bgcolor="grey">Source:<a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATT-Our-Broadband-Is-Fast-Enough-108473"> broadbandreports</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New bill demands &#8220;neutral net neutrality,&#8221; hamstrings FCC</title>
		<link>http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?p=7</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?p=7#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 23:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alexander graham bull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


What they say
 What  it means


In a statement announcing the bill, Stearns called the  FCC&#8217;s network  neutrality plan a partisan maneuver to regulate the Internet&#8230;.
Congressman Stearns should recuse himself from voting on, or creating any legislation for his major contributors at AT&#38;T, Verizon, and Comcast.


Source: ars technica



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="5" cellpadding="10" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="40%">What they say</th>
<th> What  it means</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>In a statement announcing the bill, Stearns called the  FCC&#8217;s network  neutrality plan a partisan maneuver to regulate the Internet&#8230;.</td>
<td>Congressman Stearns should recuse himself from voting on, or creating any legislation for his major contributors at AT&amp;T, Verizon, and Comcast.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" bgcolor="grey">Source: <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/05/new-bill-demands-neutral-net-neutrality-hamstrings-fcc.ars">ars technica</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=7</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Press Realizes The FiOS Party Is Over  But doesn’t quite see the bigger picture yet…</title>
		<link>http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?p=5</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?p=5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 08:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alexander graham bull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadband Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


What  they say
 What it means


&#8220;Verizon never committed to bringing FiOS to its entire local-phone  service area. It has introduced FiOS in 16 states, but the deployment is  concentrated on the East Coast, and Verizon is selling off most of its  service areas in the Midwest and on the West Coast. Its]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="5" cellpadding="10" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="40%">What  they say</th>
<th> What it means</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&#8220;Verizon never committed to bringing FiOS to its entire local-phone  service area. It has introduced FiOS in 16 states, but the deployment is  concentrated on the East Coast, and Verizon is selling off most of its  service areas in the Midwest and on the West Coast. Its stated goal was  to make FiOS available to 18 million households by the end of 2010, and  it&#8217;s on track to reach or exceed that.&#8221;</td>
<td>Where&#8217;s the surprise? AT&amp;T announced U-Verse, not because it cared about broadband but because it wanted to buy AT&amp;T, then BelllSouth&#8230; Verizon wanted to buy MCI, Alltel and dump Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont &#8212; (and Hawaii and other GTE holdings.)This was never about upgrading infrastructure but rolling out a &#8216;cable&#8217; product&#8230; and now that they got what they wanted, of course they&#8217;ll slow down/stop&#8230; Who&#8217;s going to make them do anything? The FCC? Congress? (stop laughing.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" bgcolor="grey">Source: <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/The-Press-Realizes-The-FiOS-Party-Is-Over-107639">dslreports.com</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandbullsheet.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
